With the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) set to announce its decision on South Africa’s greylisting status in the coming weeks, the nation’s economy and international standing hang in the balance. We have compiled a timeline of key events and expert commentary to provide critical context on the journey to this verdict and the high stakes involved.
This isn’t a case where we are waiting for a mere announcement; it's going to be a verdict on our country's resolve to combat the scourge of sophisticated financial crime. Whether we are removed from the list or not, the underlying issues that led us here will demand more and more vigilance. The bar is going to keep rising because criminals will keep innovating. If we slack off, the list will catch up to us again.
Since being greylisted, South Africa has faced dramatically increased costs of doing business internationally, reduced foreign investment, and significant reputational damage. Analysis by National Treasury and various economists has consistently pointed to the detrimental effect on already low GDP growth and capital flows, with the ultimate cost running into billions of Rands.
A 2023 report by research firm Intellidex estimated that the ultimate cost could be a contraction of South Africa's GDP by up to 3% over the long term, eroding capital inflows and increasing the cost of capital for all.
The FATF’s core demands centred on proving the system works in practice. Key requirements included:
Regardless of the outcome in October, the pressure, whether on the country as a whole, or on the people working at accountable institutions from car dealerships to real estate agencies, is not going to ease.
Accountable institutions must now operate with the assumption that hyper-vigilance, backed by smart technology that can detect red flags in real-time, is the new baseline for doing business in South Africa.